We will begin the history of political Ukraine with the 1920 invasion by forces of the Soviet Union brought control of the Ukrainian People’s Republic under the Ukrainian Socialist Soviet Republic. However, the Ukrainian People’s Republic maintained a president in exile throughout the domination by the Soviet Union. “Mykola Plaviuk was the last president in exile (and the fourth), serving from December 1989 until his resignation on 22 August 1992 when he ceremonially gave his presidential authority and state symbols to the newly elected Ukrainian president Leonid Kravchuk at his inauguration ceremony; thus establishing the continuity of the republic.”
During the years, Ukraine and 10 other republics and, of course – Russia, were part of the Soviet Union; Ukraine was known as the breadbasket of the Soviet Union for its internationally known agriculture success. In 1991, Soviet Leader Brezhnev realizing the decline of the Soviet Union established the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). “The Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) had its origins on December 8, 1991, when the elected leaders of Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus (Belorussia) signed an agreement forming a new association to replace the crumbling Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (U.S.S.R.). The three Slavic republics were joined by the Central Asian republics of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, by the Transcaucasian republics of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, and by Moldova. (The remaining former Soviet Republics — Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia — declined to join the new organization.) The CSI formally came into being on December 21, 1991, and began operations the following month, with the city of Minsk in Belarus designated as the administrative center.”
“The modern Ukrainian presidency was established on 5 July 1991 by the Verkhovna Rada of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, which formed the office of “president of the Ukrainian SSR. During the transitional period until the presidential election, the Chairman of the Verkhovna. Proclamation of Ukrainian independence from the Soviet Union, the office’s official title was changed to “President of Ukraine” on August 24.”
In 1991, the first elections were held to support the Declaration of Independence and elect their first President, Leonid Kravchuk on 1 December 1991. “Presidential terms are five years and limited to two terms consecutively.”) “President Kravchuk remained in office until he resigned as part of a political compromise. A snap election was held in 1994, which was won by Ukraine’s former Prime Minister Leonid Kuchma. Kuchma was re-elected for a second term of office in 1994.”
In 2004, the presidential election was marked with fraud between opposition candidate Viktor Yushchenko and government-backed candidate and former Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych. After mass protests, known as “Orange Revolution,” a new election was held on 26 December 2004 in which Viktor Yushchenko was declared winner with 52% of the vote. He was sworn in as President on 23 January 2005. Viktor Yanukovych served as Prime Minister.
In 2010, following a Constitutional Ruling, Viktor Yanukovych was elected the fourth modern president of Ukraine.
President Yanukovych was removed from power in early 2014 as a result of the 2014 Ukrainian revolution and an “acting President” was appointed. The replacement election took place and on 25 May businessman Petro Poroshendo winning over 54 percent of the vote; Poroshendo was sworn in as President on 7 June 2014.
“June 18, 2015, Yanukovych was officially deprived the title of President of Ukraine.”
In 2019, as the results of a run-off election, Volodymyr Zelensky, a Jewish actor and comedian, became the sixth President of Ukraine with 74.22% of the popular vote. President Zelensky took the oath of office on 20 May 2019.
‘The Government of Ukraine is based on a semi-presidential system. The president of Ukraine is the head of state while the prime minister is the head of government. The current Prime Minister is Denys Shmyhal.” “Ukraine is somewhat unusual in that while many countries use a similar system typically the role of one leader is relegated to being ceremonial, in Ukraine however both the prime minister and the president have great power and responsibility assigned to their roles. Because the president of Ukraine must approve the appointment of the prime minister the post of president is generally thought of as the more powerful role.”
In the above, I attempted to convey, the history of Ukrainian government, since the 1920s, that reveals, in my opinion, an unstable and corrupt government. The removal of President Yanukovych was, alleged, due to the massive corruption and abuse of government funds highlighted by the international news media however, in truth, the Ukrainian Jewish community, the Rothschild Banking Dynasty, the owners of the US Federal Reserve, US Military-Industrial Complex and other international investors sought to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the European Union, and, become internationally recognized as a member of European Union instead of economic ties with the Russian Federation. The political situation in Ukraine was organized and initiated by the fore-mentioned groups, especially the Rothschild Banking Dynasty, to recover the massive wealth potential in Ukraine. The Rothschild Family owned/controlled Russia until the arrival of Chairman Joseph Stalin.
Of interest, former President Donald J. Trump knew of the corruption in the Ukrainian government and exploited the corruption to destroy the candidacy for Senator and former Vice President Joseph R. Biden. In fact, Trump denied Congressionally approved military and economic aid to Ukraine for which he was impeached.
And, again, as in South Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, members of Congress and the President of the United States place the revenues for US corporations and international investors ahead of the lives of US military and the indebtedness to the people of the United States.
Now to explain why I used the Subject: Congress, the Federal Reserve & Military-Industrial Complex Plan Another War or Military Aggression: Beginning in the 1980s and 1990s, I began learning of Congressional Resolutions, later signed into law by the President, that were legally Acts of War against a foreign nation and, most of all, Un-Constitutional. For example, the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act directed all U.S. government agencies to utilize their resources to remove the duly elected President of Iraq, Saddam Hussein. This resolution was just one of many that Congress initiated and signed by the President, since the 1980s, to bring harm to many countries in the Middle East, Venezuela, North Korea and multiple other countries. The said resolutions were not to protect the United States but to advance the building of a Jewish Nation-State in occupied Palestine and the revenues of the Federal Reserve, the Military Industrial Complex and members of Congress based on their foreknowledge of stock increases. To this end, as a 100% Military Service-Connected Veteran, I am tired of the military being killed, wounded and otherwise injured to assure a profit for the fore mentioned above. Moreover, not only were US military, civilian contractors and government civilians suffered from the military aggression, but the citizens of the nations identified in the Congressional Resolutions and actions by our government. Enough is Enough.
On December 16, 2021, Senator Dick Durbin, D-IL), 117TH CONGRESS, 1st Session, introduced S. RES. 480, To support an independent and democratic Ukraine against any further Russian military invasion, and for other purposes. The Resolution was signed by members of the Senate who depend on Jewish support to remain in office. In fact, most of the co-signer of the Resolution made a special trip to Ukraine to speak with the Ukrainian President. The Resolution was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. To date, I do not know who the sponsors from the U.S. House of Representative required before the Resolution can proceed.
In 2018, I learned Senator Durbin and like-minded Senators had introduced a similar Resolution against the country of Venezuela. By happen stance, several years past, in a conversation with a Venezuelan immigrant, whose occupation is a certified account working with the tax service I use, I asked about the political unrest in Venezuela. His response paraphrasing, the Venezuelan government maintains strict, absolute control of all economic activities whereas the strong Jewish community wants said control. Naturally, since the Rothschild Banking Dynasty owes the Venezuelan Central Bank along with all other international countries Central Banks, including the United States, Senator Durbin and other non-US loyal Senators initiated the Resolution. I do not know if the Resolution was signed by the President or not.
United States’ Senator Rand Paul’s platform, during his first run for U.S. Senate, was to end the complete control of the US Federal Reserve System and end the unlimited economic and military support to the state of Israel. Unfortunately, after arriving in Washington and deciding to run for President, he forgot his campaign platform for his own self-interest.
Previously, in this letter, I addressed my concern, as a military veteran, to the actions by members of Congress to place the lives of the military, endanger the physical United States and our countrymen plus further indebt the taxpayers by members who have never served in the U.S. Armed Forces.
Yes, there have been some that served in the military however most never saw true combat, never been in a position surrounded by hostiles forces, on a covert or special assignment, never been in a jungle or desert environment withstanding the elements and know for certain the government would honor their claims for exposures from dioxins, toxins, and non-approved FDA immunizations and combat/non-combat In Line of Duty injuries. The ones that did suffer the stress and dangers of a military conflict such as Senator John McCain, former Prisoner of War, and the triple amputee member of Congress from Georgia and, of course, there may be others that I’m not familiar demand our action, verbally and written, to assure members of Congress, the Executive Branch and the Judicial Branch adhere to the provisions/dictates of the U.S. Constitution. Constitutionally wars require a Declaration of War by the Congress of the United States of America, not the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), Public Law l07-40, approved by a Republican controlled Congress during the Bush administration.
In 2016, the people were tired of constant wars and the leadership of the former President William Jefferson Clinton, former Senator and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former President George W. Bush, and President Barack Obama and they elected a New York businessman, Donald J. Trump as President of the United States. Too me, President Trump’s tenure was one without respect for the U.S. military and the laws of the United States plus the dictates of the U.S. Constitution. For example, he bragged about receiving one billion dollars from the Royal Saudi Government to station U.S. Forces in a desert Saudi Air Base outside of Riyadh and demanding foreign governments with U.S. and/or Joint U.S. military had to pay the United States for military protection. This decision, in my opinion, made members of the U.S. Armed Forces – mercenaries’. A second disgusting decision by Trump, in my opinion, was ordering the assassination of an Iranian General under the guise, the General was planning attacks on U.S. servicemembers when in truth, Trump was protecting US citizens vacationing in Syria’s Golan Heights. In response, Iran launched missiles against U.S. force in Iraq and injuring more than one hundred who were diagnosed with traumatic brain disorder. The third was ordering U.S. National Guardsmen into Syria to protect and steal Syrian oil, water and land plus protect Israeli Defense Forces occupying Syrian land. Trump related to the military as my military. The U.S. Armed Forces are the people’s military, not a traitor’s, in my opinion.
While writing this letter, I came across a U.S. Foreign Affairs document, dated January 10, 2021, of a Resolution, Taiwan Assurance Act, demanding the U.S. State Department to reassess self-imposed restrictions on U.S. relations with Taiwan. Of course, I agree the United States and the international community defend Taiwan just as Former Dwight David Eisenhower’s administration did in the 1950s when Taiwan was known as Formosa. However, I do not believe in the use of force as millions would perish and there is a strong possibility of a nuclear war with China and China’s allies. What I chose is for the United States to seek assistance from the United Nations and the International Court at the Hague to re-consider the ownership of Taiwan to be the original people of Taiwan, the same ethnic group that populated the Philippines, and surrounding island nation states. To me, Congressman McCaul and other members of Congress only care about the lucrative military sales and economic gains on-going with Taiwan.
Lastly, if true citizens of the United States want to retain our Constitutional Republic then beginning in November 2022 and the continuous national elections until the such date and time, the people replace the entire incumbents in the three branches of the US Federal Government. Moreover, when elected the U.S. Congress must seek several Constitutional Amendments among which would be to fund national elections through taxpayer deductions and revise the duties of members of the US Congress, especially to determine if they are full or part time employees of the United States, and, above all, place in to law, without the ability for lawyers to void the law; NO MEMBER OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OR CITIZEN IS ABOVE THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Billy Ray Wilson
Defender of the US Constitution